Dosage: Pedigree & Performance
Main Menu | Search    
 

Inbreeding in Chefs-de-Race, Their Sires and Their Dams

Jones and Bogart, in "Genetics of the Horse" (Edwards Brothers, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1971), define inbreeding as the mating of two individuals more closely related than the average of the breed.  They highly recommend that serious breeders know the amount of inbreeding in their stock in order to appreciate the rate at which homozygosity is developing, homozygosity being the condition where genes inherited from the sire and the dam are alike.  The amount of inbreeding estimates the percentage of genes put in a homozygous condition.  This estimate is always less than the the actual because records will not allow for every relationship that exists.  Horses that are highly homozygous tend to stamp their own characteristics on their offspring, a phenomenon often called "prepotency".  Prepotency also may be considered a regular or predictable transmission of particular traits.

The amount of inbreeding can be calculated using a formula proposed by Wright in 1923 (Mendelian Analysis of the Pure Breeds of Livestock, J. Hered. 14:339-348).  Wright's formula generates a fraction (the coefficient of inbreeding) which, when multiplied by 100, affords the amount of inbreeding as a percentage.

The information presented below includes the amount of inbreeding for 202 chefs-de-race (not including Buckaroo, Chief's Crown or Pleasant Colony at this time), as well as for their sires and their dams.  The raw data are preceded by some general statistics.

Observations:

The general trend of inbreeding percentage among chefs-de-race declined steadily throughout the 20th century.  The relationship between the percentage of  inbreeding and time is expressed by the following formula:

% Inbreeding = -0.0109 * Year + 22.262

Therefore, the overall rate at which inbreeding has declined since 1900 is 0.0109 percent per year, although dramatic changes occurred until about 1940, followed by a relatively steady percentage since then.  Whether this pattern among chefs-de-race represents the patterns found among all Thoroughbreds is not known at this time.  In any case, chefs-de-race foaled in successive ten-year time frames display a diminishing amount of inbreeding.

The amount of inbreeding found among chefs-de-race covers the range from over 13% for Ultimus down to 0% for Speak John, with some of the most influential stallions being found at both ends of the spectrum.  For example, Havresac II (a key link to Ribot) and Bayardo (a key link to Hyperion) are among the most highly inbred, while Native Dancer (the close up ancestor of Raise a Native and Mr. Prospector) and Ribot himself are among the least inbred.

Arguably the best runners among the chefs-de-race - Secretariat (0.1953%), Man o' War (0.8350%), Ribot (0.1465%), Nearco (0.9839%) and Sea-Bird (0.3906%) - were all inbred below the average percentage of inbreeding for the time frame in which they were foaled.

There is no significant pattern covering the relationship between inbreeding in the chefs-de-race and inbreeding in their parents.  Most (73, 36.1%) are less inbred than either parent, followed by 66 (32.7%) that are inbred more than one parent but less than the other, and 58 (28.7%) that are inbred more than either parent.  The remaining 5 (2.5%) are inbred the same as one parent.

For 55.9% of the chefs-de-race (113), their sire is more highly inbred than their dam.  For 43.1% of the chefs-de-race (87), the reverse is true.  There are two examples (1.0%) where the sire and dam of the chef-de-race exhibit the same level of inbreeding.

There are observable differences in inbreeding among chefs-de-race sorted by aptitudinal contribution; however, these differences are not statistically significant.

One may conclude from the data that the amount of inbreeding in a chef-de-race or his parents is unrelated to his ability to transmit consistent aptitudinal type to his progeny.  Prepotence for aptitudinal type apparently has a different origin.

General Statistics:
Avg. % inbreeding of all chefs-de-race: 1.1181
Avg. % inbreeding of the sires of  all chefs-de-race: 1.1558
Avg. % inbreeding of the dams of  all chefs-de-race: 1.1884

% Inbreeding over Time
Avg. % inbreeding of chefs-de-race born before 1910: 1.8091
Avg. % inbreeding of chefs-de-race born 1910-1919: 1.5773
Avg. % inbreeding of chefs-de-race born 1920-1929: 1.3128
Avg. % inbreeding of chefs-de-race born 1930-1939: 1.0025
Avg. % inbreeding of chefs-de-race born 1940-1949: 0.9687
Avg. % inbreeding of chefs-de-race born 1950-1959: 0.9521
Avg. % inbreeding of chefs-de-race born 1960-1969: 0.9114
Avg. % inbreeding of chefs-de-race born after 1969: 0.9409

Chefs-de-Race with Highest % Inbreeding    Chefs-de-Race with Lowest % Inbreeding
Ultimus: 13.2935
Havresac II: 6.5796
Bayardo: 4.2163
Gallant Man: 4.0015
Turn-to: 3.8940
Broad Brush: 3.4644
In Reality: 3.2764
Spy Song: 3.2495
Sunny Boy: 3.2227
Colorado: 2.8198
Vatout: 2.6855
Speak John: 0.0000
Native Dancer: 0.0488
Reliance II: 0.0488
Relko: 0.0488
Stage Door Johnny: 0.0977
Bold Bidder: 0.0977
Djebel: 0.0977
King's Bishop: 0.0977
Ribot: 0.1465
Promised Land: 0.1465
Secretariat: 0.1953

Inbreeding in Chefs-de-Race Relative to Their Sire and Dam
Chefs-de-race with % inbreeding < % inbreeding in either sire or dam: 73 (36.1%)
Chefs-de-race with % inbreeding > % inbreeding in either sire or dam: 58 (28.7%)
Chefs-de-race with % inbreeding > % inbreeding in sire and < % inbreeding in dam: 27 (13.4%)
Chefs-de-race with % inbreeding < % inbreeding in sire and > % inbreeding in dam: 39 (19.3%)
Chefs-de-race with % inbreeding = % inbreeding in either sire or dam: 5 (2.5%)

% Inbreeding in Chefs-de-Race by Aptitudinal Group Representation
Avg. % inbreeding for chefs-de-race in Brilliant: 1.3653
Avg. % inbreeding for chefs-de-race in Intermediate: 1.1377
Avg. % inbreeding for chefs-de-race in Classic: 0.9255
Avg. % inbreeding for chefs-de-race in Solid: 0.8945
Avg. % inbreeding for chefs-de-race in Professional: 1.0043

  Chef-de-Race Yr

%IB

      Sire                         Sire's %IB       Dam                        Dam's %IB  
  Abernant (B) 1946 0.3906       Owen Tudor 2.0410       Rustom Mahal 0.1465  
  Ack Ack (I/C) 1966 0.7910       Battle Joined 1.6113       Fast Turn 1.0620  
  Admiral Drake (P) 1931 1.2061       Craig An Eran 0.5859       Plucky Liege 0.8423  
  Alcantara II (P) 1908 0.8057       Perth 1.0156       Toison d'Or 1.0474  
  Alibhai (C) 1938 0.7813       Hyperion 2.1484       Teresina 0.6348  
  Alizier (P) 1947 0.3418       Teleferique 0.8789       Alizarine 0.2441  
  Alycidon (P) 1945 1.7725       Donatello II 0.7471       Aurora 1.8799  
  Alydar (C) 1975 0.3418       Raise a Native 0.8423       Sweet Tooth 4.1357  
  Apalachee (B) 1971 0.7324       Round Table 0.8350       Moccasin 0.8789  
  Asterus (S) 1923 1.2891       Teddy 1.2891       Astrella 1.0620  
  Aureole (C) 1950 0.8789       Hyperion 2.1284       Angelola 0.9521  
  Bachelor's Double (S) 1906 1.9067       Tredennis 2.0410       Lady Bawn 1.5845  
  Bahram (C) 1932 0.8423       Blandford 1.5576       Friar's Daughter 1.6919  
  Baldski (B/I) 1974 1.2061       Nijinsky II 0.6348       Too Bald 7.2241  
  Ballymoss (S) 1954 1.7993       Mossborough 1.7456       Indian Call 1.0620  
  Bayardo (P) 1906 4.2163       Bay Ronald 0.9155       Galicia 0.5859  
  Ben Brush (I) 1893 1.2695       Bramble 0.4883       Roseville 0.7910  
  Best Turn (C) 1966 0.7690       Turn-to 3.8940       Sweet Clementine 0.6836  
  Big Game (I) 1939 1.8530       Bahram 0.8423       Myrobella 0.5859  
  Black Toney (B/I) 1911 0.4883       Peter Pan 0.2930       Belgravia 1.6382  
  Blandford (C) 1919 1.5576       Swynford 0.8057       Blanche 2.3633  
  Blenheim II (C/S) 1927 1.3770       Blandford 1.5576       Malva 1.2061  
  Blue Larkspur (C) 1926 1.8262       Black Servant 0.3906       Blossom Time 0.5859  
  Blushing Groom (B/C) 1974 0.9521       Red God 1.4355       Runaway Bride 1.5308  
  Bois Roussel (S) 1935 1.5039       Vatout 2.6855       Plucky Liege 0.8423  
  Bold Bidder (I/C) 1962 0.0977       Bold Ruler 0.5859       High Bid 1.2695  
  Bold Ruler (B/I) 1954 0.5859       Nasrullah 0.5859       Miss Disco 0.1953  
  Brantome (C) 1931 0.4883       Blandford 1.5576       Vitamine 1.3184  
  British Empire (B) 1937 0.6348       Colombo 1.7993       Rose of England 0.8789  
  Broomstick (I) 1901 0.2930       Ben Brush 1.2695       Elf 0.7813  
  Broad Brush (I/C) 1983 3.4644       Ack Ack 0.7910       Hay Patcher 0.2441  
  Bruleur (P) 1910 0.8789       Chouberski 0.4395       Basse Terre 1.2061  
  Buckpasser (C) 1963 1.1108       Tom Fool 0.6348       Busanda 0.4883  
  Bull Dog (B) 1927 1.0620       Teddy 1.2891       Plucky Liege 0.8423  
  Bull Lea (C) 1935 0.6836       Bull Dog 1.0620       Rose Leaves 0.9839  
  Busted (S) 1963 0.7324       Crepello 0.2441       Sans Le Sou 0.1465  
  Caro (I/C) 1967 0.4395       Fortino II 1.0254       Chambord 1.3965  
  Chateau Bouscaut (P) 1927 0.3906       Kircubbin 0.5371       Ramondie 1.6919  
  Chaucer (S) 1900 0.8789       St. Simon 0.3906       Canterbury Pilgrim 1.2061  
  Cicero (B) 1902 0.8789       Cyllene 1.4062       Gas 1.0474  
  Clarissimus (C) 1913 1.4062       Radium 1.0254       Quintessence 0.7471  
  Colorado (I) 1923 2.8198       Phalaris 0.7910       Canyon 1.9336  
  Congreve (I) 1924 1.2012       Copyright 2.2559       Per Noi 1.9873  
  Count Fleet (C) 1940 0.2930       Reigh Count 3.3032       Quickly 0.5371  
  Court Martial (B) 1942 1.4648       Fair Trial 0.8057       Instantaneous 0.0488  
  Creme dela Creme (C/S) 1963 0.6836       Olympia 0.7690       Judy Rullah 0.8057  
  Crepello (P) 1954 0.2441       Donatello II 0.7471       Crepuscule 0.8350  
  Damascus (I/C) 1964 1.2012       Sword Dancer 0.7471       Kerala 1.0986  
  Danzig (I/C) 1977 0.5371       Northern Dancer 0.9521       Pas de Nom 0.2930  
  Dark Ronald (P) 1905 1.0474       Bay Ronald 0.9155       Darkie 1.4062  
  Discovery (S) 1931 0.7690       Display 1.1108       Ariadne 1.5845  
  Djebel (I) 1937 0.0977       Tourbillon 0.4395       Loika 2.2559