Dosage: Pedigree & Performance
Main Menu | Search    
 

2007 Kentucky Derby Preview:

Note: The first section of this article is the standard introduction to our pace-based approach to
analyzing the Kentucky Derby.  Those familiar with the methodology may wish to either review it or proceed directly to this year's analysis here

It is often said, “pace makes the race”.  We are all familiar with the phrase, but I dare say few of us have a firm grasp on what it means in a practical sense.  The folks at Trackmaster define pace as the tempo or rhythm of a race, which is as good a definition as any.  They further suggest, “pace is important primarily as it effects the overall energy pattern of a race horse”.  Accepting that description creates opportunities for measurement and quantification.  In other words, if a horse’s energy pattern, perhaps better described as its energy distribution throughout the course of a race, is critical to the race’s outcome, then measuring that energy distribution could provide significant insight into the details of the horse’s performance.  Once we understand the subtleties of how a horse typically or better yet, most efficiently, distributes its energy in a race we can hopefully apply our understanding to the demands of another race.  This is an approach we have used for several years to assess the potential of Kentucky Derby contenders.  By analyzing the pace characteristics of the Derby starters in their prep races, we can compare the results to those found for previous Derby winners in their prep races.  Some will fit the successful historical patterns while others won’t.  

Our methodology is multifaceted.  First, we use linear regression (involving fractional times and lengths behind) to generate the slope and intercept of the best straight line that models the individual performance.  Slope is a measure of fatigue.  The higher the slope, the longer the time required to negotiate an additional distance.  Slopes will generally fall between 0.9 (slow early-fast late) and 1.2 (fast early-slow late). Intercept is a measure of early speed and is inversely related to the slope.  In this case, the lower the intercept, the greater the relative early speed.  Intercepts also will usually fall between 0.9 (fast early) and 1.2 (slow early). Correlation Coefficient is a measure of how efficiently a horse's speed is expressed throughout the whole race.  Perfect efficiency is equal to a Correlation Coefficient of 1.00000.  Any value below 1.00000 represents less than ideal efficiency, although it is almost always greater than 0.99900.  The very best horses continually display Correlation Coefficients above 0.99990 while lower quality horses may not display Correlation Coefficients that high. We can subsequently use the slope and the intercept for a race to calculate a predicted time at any distance.  These times include a projected ten-furlong time (10f), a projected turn time in a ten-furlong race (10fTT, the time to negotiate the distance between the six furlong and eight furlong markers) and a projected last quarter-mile time in a ten-furlong race (10fLQ).  

Next, we calculate Sartin Methodology-based Brohamer pace numbers ("Modern Pace Handicapping", by Tom Brohamer, William Morrow and Company, Inc,. New York, 1991) for the same races.  Evaluating only route races these are limited to a 3Fr (Final Fraction) number which is the speed in feet-per-second from the six furlong call to the finish and a %E (Percent Early) number which is a relative measure of energy used through the six-furlong call.  Speed types display %E figures significantly higher than off-the-pace types, although the absolute numbers are greatly affected by the distance of a race.  We emphasize 3Fr and %E from among the various available Brohamer figures because these are directly related to a horse’s ability to conserve energy and to finish its races with something left in reserve.

The other Brohamer figures include EP (Early Pace), the velocity in feet-per-second to the six-furlong call; SP (Sustained Pace), the average of Early Pace and the Final Fraction, thus relating a horse's speed to the six-furlong call and his ability to finish; AP (Average Pace), the average of EP and SP; 1Fr (First Fraction) and 2Fr (Second Fraction), the average velocities in feet-per-second between each of the first two calls (start to four furlongs and four furlongs to six furlongs); and TE (Total Energy), the sum of EP and 3Fr (the total available energy based on current conditions of distance, surface and track as well as inherent ability).

Finally, we use Performance Figures (PFs), based on the same linear regression technology described earlier, as a measure of the absolute quality of the races being analyzed. 

The detailed pace figures for this year’s leading Derby contenders are here

For reference, guideline numbers (all times are in seconds; e.g., 122.34 = 2:02.34) for all Derby winners since 1984 plus Spectacular Bid and Triple Crown winners Secretariat, Seattle Slew and Affirmed are:  
 

10f 10fLQ 10fTT 3Fr %E
<=122.34 <=25.3 <=24.9 >=51.56 <=52.08

The figures for the individual Derby winners are:

Year Derby Winner 10f 10fLQ 10fTT 3Fr %E
2006 Barbaro 121.05 24.6 24.7 52.51 51.39
2005 Giacomo 119.16 24.5 24.3 52.84 51.06
2004 Smarty Jones 120.26 24.2 24.1 55.17 49.89
2003 Funny Cide 120.67 24.6 24.6 52.79 51.32
2002 War Emblem 122.34 24.8 24.7 53.80 50.23
2001 Monarchos 120.37 24.5 24.4 53.52 50.43
2000 Fusaichi Pegasus 119.94 24.5 24.4 53.48 51.16
1999 Charismatic 118.80 23.9 23.9 54.77 50.52
1998 Real Quiet 119.21 24.1 24.0 53.83 50.97
1997 Silver Charm 120.17 25.1 24.9 52.25 51.66
1996 Grindstone 121.02 24.7 24.6 54.01 50.43
1995 Thunder Gulch 121.68 24.3 24.3 53.89 50.07
1994 Go For Gin 119.64 24.1 24.1 54.64 50.37
1993 Sea Hero 121.64 24.1 24.2 52.67 50.89
1992 Lil E. Tee 121.48 24.8 24.6 52.31 51.40
1991 Strike the Gold 120.41 23.8 23.9 55.63 49.43
1990 Unbridled 121.64 24.6 24.5 53.96 49.74
1989 Sunday Silence 119.79 25.0 24.7 52.24 52.08
1988 Winning Colors 120.14 25.3 24.9 51.56 51.98
1987 Alysheba 120.41 24.6 24.5 52.76 51.41
1986 Ferdinand 121.13 24.8 24.6 52.19 51.53
1985 Spend a Buck 117.99 24.4 24.2 54.40 51.18
1984 Swale 119.54 24.0 24.0 53.92 50.51
1979 Spectacular Bid 118.88 23.5 23.6 54.28 50.67
1978 Affirmed 120.33 24.0 24.0 53.92 50.51
1977 Seattle Slew 119.79 24.8 24.8 52.94 50.88
1973 Secretariat 117.62 24.2 24.2 53.23 50.50

 
The following table represents one way, but certainly not the only way, of using pace parameters and Performance Figures as a guide to Kentucky Derby performance.  For each year since 1998, the starters are rank ordered according to the five pace-related parameters derived from Derby prep races at a mile or more on dirt.  They are 1) the fastest 10f; 2) the fastest 10f LQ 3) the fastest 10f TT; 4) the fastest 3Fr; and 5) the lowest %E.  Starters with the top five values in each category pass the initial screen.  In the second screen, only those passing the first screen and which have achieved a PF of -55 or better in a graded Derby route prep race are considered for the win.  To test the usefulness of this analysis, all qualifiers are bet across the board and in exacta combinations although this approach should not be considered a recommendation of a wagering strategy.  The results are displayed on the right side of the table.  Since 1998, this methodology has identified seven of nine winners as well as four exactas and two trifectas.  

One exception, Giacomo in 2005, did qualify by pace criteria being among the top five in three categories.  However, his best PF earned in a Derby prep race was well below the historical standard.  As a side note, it is interesting that Giacomo's Beyer Speed Figure (BSF) for his Derby win was by far the lowest since at least 1991.  He also has a DI exceeding 4.00 although not by much.  This fits with our observation of a direct correlation between BSF and DI where the lower DI Derby winners have a higher average BSF than the higher DI Derby winners and that the two groups are different in a statistically significant way.  

The other exception, Barbaro, was not among the leaders in any of the pace parameter categories although his PF -54 in the Florida Derby barely missed the cutoff.  Nevertheless, the results demonstrate that horses with exceptional performance in a Derby prep race at less than ten furlongs and which have also shown the ability to finish their races with very good energy are most likely to win.  There is nothing mysterious about the outcome.  However, it is also true that many legitimate contenders have often been overlooked by emphasizing factors that seem not to be as important. 
  

1998
10f 10f LQ 10f TT 3Fr %E        
Indian Charlie Halory Hunter Halory Hunter Halory Hunter Halory Hunter
Real Quiet Real Quiet Real Quiet Nationalore Nationalore
Old Trieste Nationalore Cape Town Real Quiet Parade Ground
Halory Hunter Cape Town Indian Charlie Indian Charlie Victory Gallop
Artax Indian Charlie Nationalore Parade Ground Cape Town
Horse # of Appearances Best Prep PF Derby Finish W P S Wager
Real Quiet 4 -59 1   18.80 8.80 5.80 6.00
Victory Gallop 1 -56 2     13.00 7.60 6.00
Indian Charlie 4 -62 3       4.20 6.00
Halory Hunter 5 -65 4         6.00
Cape Town 3 -75 5         6.00
Artax 1 -60 13         6.00
Parade Ground 2 -51 Exactas: 291.80 60.00
Old Trieste 1 -31
Nationalore 4
1999
10f 10f LQ 10f TT 3Fr %E        
Charismatic Stephen Got Even Charismatic Ecton Park Ecton Park
Adonis Charismatic Stephen Got Even Stephen Got Even Stephen Got Even
Prime Timber Excellent Meeting Excellent Meeting Charismatic Kimberlite Pipe
Excellent Meeting K One King Prime Timber Kimberlite Pipe K One King
Menifee Ecton Park K One King Excellent Meeting Answer Lively
Ecton Park
Horse # of Appearances Best Prep PF Derby Finish W P S Wager
Charismatic 5 -64 1   64.60 27.80 14.40 6.00
Menifee 1 -75 2     8.40 5.80 6.00
Prime Timber 2 -59 4         6.00
Excellent Meeting 4 -67 5         6.00
Adonis 1 -72 17         6.00
Ecton Park 3 -50 Exactas: 727.80 40.00
Kimberlite Pipe 2 -50
Answer Lively 1 -50
Stephen Got Even 4 -44
K One King 3 -34
2000
10f 10f LQ 10f TT 3Fr %E        
Aptitude Impeachment Impeachment Impeachment Impeachment
Fusaichi Pegasus Deputy Warlock Deputy Warlock Aptitude Ronton
War Chant Aptitude Aptitude War Chant Anees
Deputy Warlock Anees Anees Deputy Warlock Wheelaway
More Than Ready Wheelaway Wheelaway Fusaichi Pegasus Aptitude
Fusaichi Pegasus
War Chant
Horse # of Appearances Best Prep PF Derby Finish W P S Wager
Fusaichi Pegasus 3 -80 1   6.60 5.60 4.00 6.00
Aptitude 5 -57 2     9.80 5.80 6.00
More Than Ready 1 -69 4         6.00
Wheelaway 2 -57 5         6.00
War Chant 3 -63 9         6.00
Anees 3 -52 Exactas: 66.00 40.00
Deputy Warlock 4 -24
Impeachment 4 -23
Ronton 1
2001
10f 10f LQ 10f TT 3Fr %E        
Startac Startac Startac Startac Fifty Stars
Point Given Jamaican Rum Jamaican Rum Fifty Stars Startac
Thunder Blitz Thunder Blitz Thunder Blitz Balto Star Monarchos
Jamaican Rum Fifty Stars Point Given Point Given Dollar Bill
Congaree Monarchos Monarchos Monarchos Balto Star
Point Given Fifty Stars
Talk Is Money Talk Is Money
Horse # of Appearances Best Prep PF Derby Finish W P S Wager
Monarchos 4 -70 1   23.00 11.80 8.80 6.00
Congaree 1 -76 3       7.20 6.00
Thunder Blitz 3 -76 4         6.00
Point Given 4 -65 5         6.00
Balto Star 2 -69 14         6.00
Jamaican Rum 3 -51 Exactas: 40.00
Startac 5 -49
Talk Is Money 2 -34
Fifty Stars 4 -5